Health Insurance Exchanges Will Go a Long Way Toward Fixing the Broken Health Care System
The non-elderly population across the country relies on employer-sponsored health insurance (ESI) as their primary form of health coverage. In eleven of the last twelve years, however, ESI coverage has declined. Across the country, on average, ESI coverage for the under-65 population fell 10.8 percentage points from 2000 to 2012. Translated into raw numbers, if the ESI coverage rate had not declined over this period, 29 million more Americans would be covered today by their employers. Twenty-two states experienced losses in excess of 10 percentage points over the period. The largest declines in coverage occurred in Nevada, Michigan, Georgia, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Indiana, each with losses of at least 13 percentage points.
As a result of these losses, the average coverage rate in 2012 was down to 58.4 percent. The map below compares ESI coverage for the entire under-65 population across states in 2011/2012.1 Massachusetts has the highest rate of ESI coverage at 70.8 percent. It is followed by New Hampshire (70.0 percent), Connecticut (69.7 percent), Minnesota (69.0 percent), North Dakota (67.6 percent), and Maryland (67.3 percent). In contrast, less than half of New Mexico’s non-elderly population has ESI, at 47.2 percent.
Employer-sponsored health insurance coverage by state, population under 65 years old, 2011–2012
State | ESI Coverage |
---|---|
Alabama | 57.9% |
Alaska | 57.0% |
Arizona | 54.8% |
Arkansas | 50.1% |
California | 52.6% |
Colorado | 61.4% |
Connecticut | 69.7% |
Delaware | 64.4% |
District of Columbia | 57.6% |
Florida | 51.8% |
Georgia | 54.5% |
Hawaii | 65.9% |
Idaho | 56.7% |
Illinois | 60.8% |
Indiana | 63.0% |
Iowa | 64.5% |
Kansas | 59.9% |
Kentucky | 57.5% |
Louisiana | 53.0% |
Maine | 60.9% |
Maryland | 67.3% |
Massachusetts | 70.8% |
Michigan | 62.5% |
Minnesota | 69.0% |
Mississippi | 53.7% |
Missouri | 60.6% |
Montana | 51.5% |
Nebraska | 63.0% |
Nevada | 56.4% |
New Hampshire | 70.0% |
New Jersey | 66.0% |
New Mexico | 47.2% |
New York | 59.6% |
North Carolina | 55.9% |
North Dakota | 67.6% |
Ohio | 61.4% |
Oklahoma | 54.0% |
Oregon | 57.1% |
Pennsylvania | 64.6% |
Rhode Island | 62.6% |
South Carolina | 56.8% |
South Dakota | 59.0% |
Tennessee | 56.0% |
Texas | 52.1% |
Utah | 66.3% |
Vermont | 60.9% |
Virginia | 64.0% |
Washington | 59.3% |
West Virginia | 59.2% |
Wisconsin | 64.7% |
Wyoming | 61.1% |
Source: Author's analysis of Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement microdata
These huge losses almost surely explain the increasing demand for health reform that characterized the years leading up to the passage of the ACA, and highlight why health reform was so important. The fact is the employer-based health insurance system was fraying rapidly in the decade before health reform was implemented. Even before the ACA’s implementation, many of those losing ESI found shelter in public insurance, which disguised the precipitous drop in employer coverage. Indeed, from 2000 to 2012, public insurance, primarily in the form of Medicaid and CHIP, helped counteract the erosion in employment-based coverage and is the only reason why the uninsured rate did not rise one-for-one with the fall in ESI. However, many Americans, particularly those of working age, are still falling through the cracks. Fortunately, once the (admittedly too large) kinks are worked out, the health insurance exchanges created under the ACA will make it easier and more affordable for Americans to secure and maintain health insurance coverage, even if ESI continues the decline that has characterized the last decade.
Endnotes
1. Because of sample size requirements, I combined two years of data 2011 and 2012.
Enjoyed this post?
Sign up for EPI's newsletter so you never miss our research and insights on ways to make the economy work better for everyone.